Jason Burns / jasonburns.co.uk
Available - taking new work Contact

I checked 18 AI visibility tools' pricing pages in one day

Pricing for 18 AI visibility and GEO tools, first checked in July 2026 and re-checked in October 2026. What changed, the original dataset, and why the advertised price is rarely what you pay.

Key takeaways

  • The advertised price is almost never the working price. Otterly's $29 tier excludes three engines that cost $47 a month to add. Positive Surfer's $49 tier tracks zero AI prompts. In July, Profound's $99 tier tracked ChatGPT and nothing else; by October Profound had no self-serve paid plan for brands at all.
  • Vendors keep moving. Between July and October 2026 Rankability and Goodie repriced, Profound withdrew its brand plans, HubSpot's grader went back to its old name, and Semrush was selling a standalone AI Visibility plan that my July audit said no longer existed. Most comparison pages have not noticed.
  • You are paying for engine coverage, not prompt volume. Claude is still one of the most gated engines: Profound, Scrunch, Peec and Goodie keep it for Enterprise, and AIClicks charges extra for it on its two cheaper plans.
  • In July three vendors could not be priced from their own websites. By October Ahrefs and Rankability had fixed that, while BrandLight still publishes no price and Profound publishes none for brands.
Updated What changed on

Fact-checked The HubSpot, Semrush, Ahrefs, Rankability, Goodie, Geordy.ai, Positive Surfer, Profound and AIClicks facts in this update were re-checked against the 14 October 2026 source checks; other lines in the July sections were not re-checked again and keep their 20 July framing.

  • Re-checked every vendor on its own pricing page and added a section near the top listing what changed since July.
  • Used HubSpot's current name, AI Search Grader, in the free tools advice, and noted that /aeo-grader now redirects to /ai-search-grader, and pointed the HubSpot link in the July table at /ai-search-grader.
  • Noted that Semrush sells a standalone AI Visibility Toolkit from $99 a month per domain, billed yearly, and that its self-serve AI tracking names ChatGPT, Google AI, Gemini and Perplexity, and does not name Claude or Grok.
  • Dated the July Ahrefs and Rankability price notes and added their October 2026 prices, and replaced the old Goodie price with its October 2026 Core plan.
  • Added the October 2026 Claude changes at Ahrefs, Rankability and Semrush below the July Claude summary.
  • Updated the working-price chart: Positive Surfer is now $82 on its AI Search Analytics plan, the Profound bar is marked as July figures, and the AIClicks note shows Claude and Perplexity as extras below Business.
  • Corrected the Geordy.ai row: it logs bot requests to the files it serves, it does not read your server logs.

I spent a day opening the live pricing page of every AI visibility tool I could find, 18 of them, and writing down what it actually said. Not what a comparison post said. Not what the vendor said last year. What the page said on 20 July 2026.

Most published comparisons of these tools are wrong, and not by a little. The full dataset is below, along with the four vendors who changed product this year and the three whose own websites cannot be used to work out a price.

A wall of identical rack-mounted servers where only a handful show lit status indicators

What changed by October 2026#

On 14 October 2026 I opened every pricing page again. Everything after this section is the original 20 July record. Where a July line is now out of date, this table says so, and some of those lines also carry a dated October note.

Tool20 July 202614 October 2026
Profound$99 a month for ChatGPT only, $399 for 100 prompts on 3 enginesNo self-serve paid plan for brands. A free trial runs 50 prompts daily for 7 days on ChatGPT, Gemini and AI Overviews, then Enterprise is custom-priced, with up to 9 engines. Agencies pay $99 a month plus $399 per client workspace.
Rankability$99 for 10,000 credits up to $799 for 200,000. Only ChatGPT named$97 a month for 100 tracked AI queries, $297 for 300, $497 for 500. All 11 platforms on every tier, Claude, Grok and Copilot included, tracked daily. No credits. 7-day trial, card needed.
GoodieExplorer $399 for 100 prompts on 3 engines, 30-day refundExplorer and the refund are gone. Core is $354 billed monthly or $295 billed yearly, for 110 prompts on 5 engines, AI Mode included, with a 7-day free trial. The page's own FAQ still says plans start at $399. Claude, Grok, DeepSeek and Meta stay Enterprise only.
Positive SurferCheapest route to 50 prompts on 5 engines was Pro at $182An AI Search Analytics plan, not in my July record, at $82 a month billed yearly: 50 prompts daily on ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Mode, AI Overviews and Gemini. The $49 and $182 tiers are unchanged. The FAQ says monthly billing exists, but monthly prices are not printed.
Ahrefs Brand RadarTwo pages, two prices ($199 and $398). No Claude at any price. Grok trackedBoth pages now share one structure: $199 a month per AI index, $699 for all of them. The product page showed euros from the UK (EUR 179 and EUR 654). Claude is now tracked through custom prompts only, at 8 checks per update, and custom prompt packages start at $50 a month. Ahrefs' help centre says new Grok data collection is paused.
SemrushStandalone AI Toolkit retired, old URL a 404. Claude includedA standalone AI Visibility plan is on sale at $99 a month per domain, billed yearly, for 25 daily prompts on ChatGPT, Google AI, Gemini and Perplexity. I cannot tell whether it returned after July or I checked a different URL then. Plan prices are unchanged ($117.33 and $165.17 a month, billed yearly). The rendered pricing pages did not name Claude.
HubSpotGrader renamed AEO GraderRenamed back. /aeo-grader now redirects to /ai-search-grader, titled AI Search Grader. Paid AEO is still $50 a month, or $45 billed yearly, for 25 prompts on ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini, with a 28-day trial and no card.
AIClicks$59 for 30 prompts, choice of 3 from 9 engines, Claude among themPrices unchanged at $59, $189 and $499. The pool is now 13 models, but on Starter and Pro the included choice is ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, AI Overviews and AI Mode. Claude, Perplexity, Grok and DeepSeek are paid add-ons there, price not published. Business chooses 6 from all 13.
Peec AI$95, choose 3 of 6 engines, Perplexity among them. No Claude or GrokPrices unchanged at $95, $245 and $495 a month. The self-serve choice is now ChatGPT, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Copilot, Gemini and Naver AI, with Perplexity as an extra model. Enterprise now lists Claude, Grok, DeepSeek, Qwen, Mistral and Meta.
Rankscale AIEssentials $20 in the compare table. 10 enginesEssentials now shows $17 a month, yearly only, though the page's structured data still lists a $20 monthly offer. A Pro+ tier at $229 arrived on 29 September 2026. The vendor now says 17+ engines. Credit cost per run varies: 0.25 for ChatGPT, 2 for Claude.
NightwatchEUR 79 a monthEUR 79 is the yearly-billing rate. Billed monthly, Starter is EUR 99 for 50 prompts, 500 keywords and 6 engines. Professional and Agency tiers are also listed. I have not checked whether EUR 79 was the monthly price in July.
SE Ranking$89 add-on on $129 Core, 5 enginesPrices unchanged. The add-on card now lists 4 engines, without Gemini, while the plan table still says 5. Core on its own lists 100 daily prompts on 5 LLMs. SE Visible, sold on its own, is $99, $189 or $355 a month billed monthly for 200, 450 or 1,000 prompts on 5 engines, with Basic at $79 a month billed yearly. The 14-day trial includes 20 AI prompts a day.
Scrunch AI$250 for 125 prompts, 4 enginesPrice, prompts and engines unchanged. Core now lists 1 persona and 1 language, and is charged per brand, per month. Sitecore announced it had acquired Scrunch on 3 June 2026, which I did not record in July.
Geordy.ai$39 for 500 file updates. Reads crawler logsPro is still $39 a month, but that is the yearly-billing rate; billed monthly it is $49. The unit is now "files". Its bot analytics logs requests to the files Geordy itself serves, not your server's logs, so my July line "reads crawler logs" overstated it. 16 formats in total.

Scroll the table sideways to see every column.

Every tool name links to the page I read on 14 October 2026. Prices in US dollars unless stated, as each page showed them.

No change to the figures I use for Otterly.AI ($29 Lite, $47 of add-ons, Claude at $439 on Premium) or Frase ($39 for 50 prompts on two engines). Texavor's prices and credits are the same, and BrandLight still has no pricing page. goodie.ai is still parked and for sale at $150,000.

So three things in the July sections below no longer hold. Positive Surfer's working price is now $82, not $182, and Profound has no published working price. Ahrefs and Rankability can now be priced from their own pages, while Profound joins BrandLight in publishing no price for brands. And the Claude column has moved: Ahrefs now tracks it through custom prompts, Rankability names it on every tier, AIClicks has made it a paid add-on on its cheaper plans, and Semrush's pricing pages did not name it when I re-checked.

The full dataset#

Everything verified against the vendor's live pricing page on 20 July 2026. Prices in US dollars unless stated, because that is how the vendors list them.

ToolEntry priceWhat that buysEngines at entryFree trial
Texavor$11/mo1,100 AI creditsNot a trackerFree tier, 350 credits
Rankscale AI$20/moEssentials, hidden in the compare table10, same on every tierYes, terms not stated
Otterly.AI$29/mo15 prompts4, plus 3 paid add-onsYes, terms not stated
Frase$39/mo50 tracked prompts27 days, no card
Geordy.ai$39/mo500 file updatesNot a trackerFree tier, 40 updates
Positive Surfer$49/mo10 pages, zero AI prompts0Yes, terms not stated
HubSpot AEO$50/moPaid tier; the grader is free3Yes, plus free grader
AIClicks$59/mo30 prompts3 of 93 days, no card
NightwatchEUR 79/mo50 AI prompts, 500 keywords614 days, no card
SE Ranking$89/mo add-on200 prompts, plus Core at $129514 days, no card
Peec AI$95/mo50 prompts, 1 country3 of 6Yes, terms not stated
Profound$99/mo50 prompts, 1,500 responses1Partial, terms not stated
Rankability$99/mo10,000 creditsNot publishedNot stated
Semrush$117.33/moSEO plan; $165.17 adds prompt tracking67 days, plus free tier
Ahrefs Brand Radar$199 to $699/moAdd-on, metered in checks7None
Scrunch AI$250/mo125 prompts, 5 site audits47 days, self-serve
Goodie$399/mo100 prompts, 3,000 responses3Yes, 30-day refund
BrandLightNot publishedNot statedNot statedNone, demo only

Scroll the table sideways to see every column.

Sorted by entry price. Note how little that column tells you: the $11 and $39 rows are not trackers at all, and the $49 row tracks nothing. Every tool name links to the pricing page I read, so you can check my working.

The advertised price is rarely the price#

Working price below means the cheapest tier that tracks roughly 50 prompts across four or more engines, including any add-ons needed to get there.

Otterly.AI 2.6x
Advertised
$29
Working
$76
15 prompts, 7 engines, once you add Gemini, AI Mode and Claude
Positive Surfer 1.7x
Advertised
$49
Working
$82
October 2026: the AI Search Analytics plan tracks 50 prompts daily across five AI engines for $82 a month, billed yearly. In July the cheapest route was Pro at $182. The $49 tier tracks no AI prompts
AIClicks 3.2x
Advertised
$59
Working
$189
150 prompts, choose 4 engines. Claude and Perplexity cost extra below the Business plan
SE Ranking 2.4x
Advertised
$89
Working
$218
200 prompts, 5 engines. The add-on needs a Core plan underneath it
Peec AI 1.4x
Advertised
$95
Working
$130
50 prompts, 4 engines. Each engine past three is a separate charge
Profound 4x
Advertised
$99
Working
$399
July 2026 figures: 100 prompts on 3 engines, and the $99 tier tracked ChatGPT alone. Profound no longer publishes paid prices for brands: it offers a free trial, then custom enterprise pricing
Advertised entry price Working price, 50 prompts and 4+ engines
Scrunch and Semrush are absent because their advertised and working prices are the same, at $250 and $165. That honesty is rarer than it should be.

The pattern is consistent enough to be a rule: the entry tier is limited by engines, not by prompts. Prompt counts are the number vendors print because it sounds generous. Engine coverage is what they actually charge for.

Which tools cover which engines#

ToolChatGPTAI OverviewsAI ModePerplexityGeminiClaudeCopilotGrok
RankscaleIncludedIncludedIncludedIncludedIncludedIncludedIncludedIncluded
SemrushIncludedIncludedNot offeredIncludedIncludedNot publishedNot offeredNot published
NightwatchIncludedIncludedIncludedIncludedIncludedIncludedNot offeredNot offered
AhrefsIncludedIncludedIncludedIncludedIncludedNot offeredIncludedIncluded
SE RankingIncludedIncludedIncludedIncludedIncludedNot offeredNot offeredNot offered
AIClicksHigher tierHigher tierHigher tierHigher tierHigher tierHigher tierHigher tierHigher tier
Otterly.AIIncludedIncludedPaid add-onIncludedPaid add-onPaid add-onIncludedNot offered
Scrunch AIIncludedIncludedHigher tierIncludedHigher tierHigher tierIncludedHigher tier
Peec AIHigher tierHigher tierHigher tierHigher tierHigher tierNot offeredHigher tierNot offered
ProfoundIncludedHigher tierHigher tierHigher tierHigher tierHigher tierHigher tierHigher tier
Positive SurferIncludedHigher tierHigher tierHigher tierHigher tierNot offeredNot offeredNot offered
RankabilityIncludedNot publishedNot publishedNot publishedNot publishedNot publishedNot publishedNot published

Scroll the table sideways to see every engine.

Included at entry tier Needs a higher tier Chargeable add-on Not offered Not published
Read down the Claude column. That one engine narrows the market more than price does. This is the July record, except Semrush's Claude and Grok cells: in July I marked both as included, but in October 2026 Semrush's self-serve AI tracking named ChatGPT, Google AI, Gemini and Perplexity, and did not name Claude or Grok.

In July, Claude was gated almost everywhere. Ahrefs did not offer it at any price. Peec reserved it for Enterprise. Profound and Scrunch put it behind their top tiers. Otterly charged $29 a month for it on the entry plan and $439 a month on Premium. I recorded only Semrush and Rankscale as including it without a fight.

By October 2026 Ahrefs Brand Radar could track Claude on custom prompts, where each Claude check costs 8 checks. Rankability's $97 Starter plan covers 11 AI platforms, Claude among them. Semrush's self-serve AI tracking names ChatGPT, Google AI, Gemini and Perplexity, and does not name Claude.

If your buyers are developers or technical founders, people for whom Claude is the default assistant, that single column cuts your options from about ten to three.

The four changes nobody has updated for#

VendorWhat comparison pages still sayWhat is actually true
SemrushAI Toolkit sold as a priced add-onIn July I recorded the add-on as retired. In October 2026 Semrush sells a standalone AI Visibility Toolkit from $99 a month per domain, billed yearly. Adobe completed its acquisition on 28 April 2026, so Semrush is no longer independently listed.
HubSpotAI Search GraderIn July it was called AEO Grader. By October 2026 it was called AI Search Grader again, and /aeo-grader redirects to /ai-search-grader.
SurferSurfer SEONow Positive Surfer, under Positive Group.
SE RankingAI Visibility TrackerRenamed AI Search Toolkit. A second standalone product, SE Visible, has been spun out alongside it.
Four renames, repackagings or acquisitions inside six months. If a page you are reading uses the left-hand names, it has not been checked this year. By October 2026 the HubSpot and Semrush rows had moved again.

Three pricing pages you cannot buy from#

In July, Ahrefs published two different prices. The main pricing page said Brand Radar started from $199 a month as an add-on. The Brand Radar product page said $398 for selected platforms and $699 for all of them. Both pages were live on the same day. By October 2026 both pages agreed: Ahrefs' AI Visibility Index costs $199 a month per AI platform, or $699 for all of them.

BrandLight has no pricing page at all. The /pricing URL returns a 404 and does not appear in their sitemap. Every call to action is "get a demo". Its engine coverage is only visible in dashboard screenshots on the marketing site, never in a published claim.

In July, Rankability told you the money and not the function. Tiers ran from 10,000 credits at $99 to 200,000 at $799. ChatGPT was the only AI engine named anywhere on the page, and there was no prompt-to-credit conversion published, so you could not work out what 10,000 credits bought before you paid. By October 2026 Rankability starts at $97 a month for 100 tracked AI queries across 11 AI platforms, with no credits.

To be fair to all three, unpublished pricing is a legitimate choice for enterprise software. It just means those products cannot be compared on price with the self-serve ones, and any list that ranks them side by side is inventing the comparison.

Half the "GEO tools" market does not measure anything#

This surprised me more than the pricing did. Several products that appear consistently on best-GEO-tools lists do not track your AI visibility at all.

ToolPriceSold asActually doesMeasures visibility?
Texavor$11/moGEO toolContent research, briefs, scoring and publishing into WordPress or WebflowNo
Geordy.ai$39/moGEO toolGenerates llms.txt, JSON-LD and markdown versions of your pages; logs bot requests to the files it servesNo
Frase$39/moContent OS for AI searchContent optimiser, with a genuine 50-prompt tracking module attachedPartly
Positive Surfer$49/moAI trackerContent optimisation. The entry tier tracks zero promptsNot at entry
All four are decent products answering a different question. Buying one expecting measurement is the most expensive mistake in this market, because you find out three months later that you still cannot tell whether anything worked.

There is one twist worth knowing. Frase's visibility module includes 50 tracked prompts on its $39 Starter plan, which undercuts every dedicated tracker at the same prompt count by a distance. It covers only ChatGPT and Google AI at that tier, so it is not a like-for-like replacement. But the cheapest way to track 50 prompts in this entire category is a tool that is not sold as a tracker.

Goodie is not where the lists say it is. Several pages cite goodie.ai. That domain is parked and listed for sale at $150,000. The product lives at higoodie.com, and its Core plan is $295 a month billed yearly ($354 billed monthly) for 110 prompts across five engines (October 2026). Anyone citing goodie.ai did not open the link.

How to check this yourself in twenty minutes#

You do not need to audit 18 vendors. You need to check the two or three you are considering.

  1. Find the engine list before you find the price. If you cannot see which engines each tier covers, that tells you how the product is sold.
  2. Write down what the entry tier includes before you look at the money. Prompts, engines, refresh frequency, competitors tracked.
  3. Search the page for "add-on". That is where the real cost hides.
  4. Check refresh frequency. Weekly sampling of a signal that varies run to run is close to useless. Daily is the minimum worth paying for.
  5. Open the product page as well as the pricing page. They often disagree, and the product page is usually the more expensive truth.
  6. Write down the date you checked. In this category that is not pedantry.

What I would do with a budget#

If you have never measured, do not buy anything yet. Run a free check and sample ten prompts by hand. You are looking for whether you appear at all, not for a trend line. HubSpot's AI Search Grader, SE Ranking's five free daily checks and the free checker on this site all cost nothing.

If you are ready to monitor, write your prompt list before you open a single pricing page. Not keywords, prompts: the questions a buyer types into ChatGPT before they know your name. Most businesses land between 20 and 40, and that number decides your tier more reliably than any feature comparison.

Then pick engines from where your buyers are, not from the vendor's list. For UK B2B that is mostly Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT. Paying an add-on for Meta AI coverage is a rounding error.

Why these pages go stale#

It is worth saying plainly why so much of this is wrong, because it is not laziness in the ordinary sense.

Tool comparison content is written once and monetised forever. There is no editorial trigger to re-check it, and much of it carries affiliate links, which creates a mild incentive to keep the recommendation stable rather than accurate. Meanwhile the vendors ship, rename, get acquired and repackage on a quarterly cycle.

The result is a genre that reads as authoritative and describes a market that no longer exists.

I cannot fix the incentive. What I can do is put the date on it. Everything above was true on 20 July 2026. Some of it will be wrong by October, and when it is, I would rather you knew which parts to distrust than assumed the whole thing still held.

The underlying comparisons, updated as vendors move, live in the AI visibility tools guide, the GEO tools guide and the AI search rank trackers guide.

Frequently asked

How much do AI visibility tools actually cost in 2026?
Verified October 2026. Entry prices run from $17 a month for Rankscale Essentials (billed yearly) to $354 a month for Goodie Core (billed monthly, or $295 billed yearly). Profound and BrandLight publish no price for brands. The more useful number is what it costs to track roughly 50 prompts across four or more engines. The cheapest routes I found were SE Visible at $79 for 200 prompts, Positive Surfer at $82 and Nightwatch at EUR 79, all billed yearly, and Rankability at $97 billed monthly. Frase is the outlier at $39 billed yearly for 50 prompts on two engines, because it is sold as a content tool rather than a tracker.
What is the cheapest AI visibility tool?
Verified October 2026. Rankscale's Essentials plan is the lowest figure, at $17 a month billed yearly, but it appears only in the comparison table, and the page's own structured data still lists a $20 monthly offer. Otterly's $29 Lite plan is the cheapest openly sold tracking tier, though it covers 15 prompts and excludes Gemini, Google AI Mode and Claude unless you pay for add-ons. AIClicks at $59 gives 30 prompts and a choice of three engines from five included ones. For 50 or more prompts on five or more engines, the cheapest I found were SE Visible's Basic plan ($79 a month billed yearly, $99 monthly, 200 prompts on five engines), Positive Surfer's AI Search Analytics plan ($82 a month billed yearly, 50 prompts) and Nightwatch (EUR 79 a month billed yearly, EUR 99 monthly, 50 prompts on six engines).
Why is AI visibility tool pricing so hard to compare?
Because vendors gate on different axes. Some limit prompts, some limit engines, some limit both, and some sell engines as individual add-ons. Two tools at the same monthly price can differ by a factor of five in what they actually track. Comparing headline prices alone tells you almost nothing.
Which AI visibility tools track Claude?
Verified October 2026. Rankscale, Rankability and Nightwatch include Claude on every tier, though Rankscale charges 2 credits a run for it against 0.25 for ChatGPT. Otterly sells it as an add-on, from $29 a month on Lite up to $439 on Premium. AIClicks charges extra for it on Starter and Pro without publishing the price, and includes it in the choice on Business at $499. Frase adds it on its Scale plan at $239 a month billed yearly. Ahrefs now tracks it through custom prompts only, at 8 checks per update. Profound, Scrunch, Peec and Goodie keep it for Enterprise. Semrush's pricing pages did not name Claude when I checked.
Do UK buyers pay more for these tools?
Verified October 2026. Most of these vendors list US dollars, and Nightwatch prices in euros only, so UK buyers usually carry the exchange rate and any card conversion fee on top of the listed figure. Some sites change currency by visitor location: from England, Ahrefs' Brand Radar page showed euros, and Semrush and SE Ranking showed pounds to a direct request. Check the currency at checkout, and whether VAT is added, before committing to an annual plan.
How often does this pricing change?
Faster than most comparison pages update. When I re-checked all 18 tools on 14 October 2026, less than three months after the first audit, Profound had withdrawn its self-serve brand plans, Rankability and Goodie had repriced, and HubSpot's grader had gone back to its old name. I would not trust any pricing comparison in this category that does not state the date it was checked, including this one.